If you are a medical student or a laboratory worker, you face difficulties writing a lab report, so don’t worry, follow this article for a complete guide on “how to write a lab report?”.
Furthermore, the general format for lab reports is described in this document, which you can modify as necessary. Although lab reports are the most common type of engineering document and can account for up to 25% of a course, little time or attention is given to how to write them effectively. Even worse, each professor has slightly different preferences.
Additionally, despite changes, lab reports always have the same objective: to communicate your findings’ relevance and record your results. In light of this, we can discuss the structure and fundamental elements of the report. However, knowing the parts and their function will allow you to adjust to the unique requirements of a course or lecturer. An excellent lab report shows the writer’s understanding of the ideas behind the data in addition to just presenting the data.
It is not sufficient to just report the expected and observed outcomes; you must also explain any differences that emerged. Explain how they affected the experiment, and demonstrate your comprehension of the theories the investigation was intended to test. However, remember that only a small organization or clear thought can compensate for a format. You still need to organize and coherently communicate your ideas properly.
This article will cover, what is a lab report, how to write a lab report, and the qualities of a laboratory report.
What is a lab report?
Additionally, you will frequently be required to write up the findings of your work in a Lab Report, regardless of whether your study is conducted at a university lab or on some other distant work site. In a nutshell, this report will outline the initial hypothesis your work tries to test, the procedures you used to test it, however, your findings and testing outcomes, your analysis and interpretation of these findings, and your conclusions.
You are frequently asked to duplicate the findings of others in an academic setting, especially in the first courses, as opposed to conducting your original study. It is typically intended to educate students on the proper use of instruments, procedures, processes, data analysis, and documentation, as well as to instill in them an awareness of the scientific method.
Furthermore, you’ll be able to create your research projects and new information after showing that you can comprehend and use the scientific method in these situations. Then, your reports become how you disseminate this further information to the industry and society.
Students frequently believe that science consists of “facts” and objective data. Therefore it can come as a surprise when they discover that scientific writing also presents and supports assertions, just like writing in other academic subgenres.
Thus, scientists and engineers must persuade readers that their discoveries are valid (can be duplicated) and essential to make worthwhile contributions to human knowledge (will have an impact).
Additionally, people will judge your work in part based on how you present it, so how you write these reports can impact its authority and credibility. Yes, even lab reports have a persuasive component and need to utilize rhetorical devices with care. However, ineffective document design, sloppy writing, a lack of respect for convention, and a lack of structure can all undermine your authority and competence, lowering your work’s value.
Unusual features
The lab report’s beginning contains odd characteristics that don’t apply to a typical introduction. For instance, the introduction addresses essential theoretical concepts and states the experiment’s principal goal. A thesis statement is also present in traditional introduction sections. Additionally, for the report, though, that is not the case. Instead, participants offer a purpose statement that outlines the experiment’s primary goal. The website wr1ter.com/lab-report.
Furthermore, the experiment’s intricacy affects how much contextual information is presented. Because there is no other section in the framework for theoretical justifications, the introduction must give a thorough exposition of the underlying ideas that serve as the cornerstone of the experiment’s design. As a result, this introduction section does not follow the rules and structure that are generally accepted. the website wr1ter.com/lab-report
Other qualities
The lab report must be written simultaneously using the present and past tenses, as prescribed by specific criteria. For instance, a researcher should use the past tense while discussing any event during the experiment. The justification for using the past tense is also supported by the fact that the investigation has already been carried out and finished.
In this instance, content referencing the report, stationary equipment, and theories are presented in the present tense. In addition, the fundamental claim is that the relevant objects are still around. Therefore, the choice of verb tense impacts the audience’s capacity to understand the document’s meaning.
How to write a lab report?
A lab report explains a scientific experiment’s purpose, procedures, findings, and recommendations. A lab report’s primary goal is to show that you comprehend the scientific method by conducting and analyzing a practical lab experiment. Typically, this project is shorter than a research article. Lab reports are frequently utilized in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The structure and writing of a lab report are the main topics of this essay.
How to format a lab report?
The sections of a lab report can vary depending on the scientific subject and the course requirements. Still, they almost always include a lab experiment’s objectives, procedures, and results. However, each section of a lab report serves a specific function.
- Title: explains the subject of your research
- Abstract: Objectives, procedures, findings, and conclusions of your research.
- Introduction: Establishes the background necessary to comprehend the issue.
- Method: Outlines the supplies and techniques employed in the experiment.
- Reports: Descriptive and inferential statistical findings.
- Discussion: Explains and assesses findings, pointing out limits
- Conclusion: Summarizes the critical outcomes of your experiment.
Additionally, Although these elements are often included in lab reports, some sections may be skipped or combined with others. For instance, some lab reports do not require a distinct conclusion and instead have a brief team on research objectives in place of an introduction. However, it is best to confirm your lab report requirements with your instructor if you need clarification.
Title
Your lab report’s title gives readers their first impression, and good tags clearly state the subject and conclusions of your research. Make a title that expresses your study’s principal objective or topic in plain language. It should be informative rather than artistic or thought-provoking.
Example
- The impact of different nitrogen concentrations on tomato plant height.
- Examining the McGurk effect’s applicability everywhere.
- Comparing the viscosities of typical kitchen liquids.
Abstract
A lab report’s abstract is a summary of the report that is between 150 and 300 words long. It should give readers a condensed summary of the research objectives, thus, the techniques and materials employed, the key findings, and the overall finding.
Furthermore, consider it a technique to give readers a sneak peek at your lab report. After you’ve written all the other sections of your report, write the abstract last, in the past tense, so you may briefly recap each one.
However, use these leading questions to help you develop a lab report abstract:
- What is the bigger picture behind your research?
- What scientific question were you attempting to address?
- How were the experiments carried out?
- What did your findings indicate?
- How did you analyze the outcomes?
- What significance do your results have?
Example
High-quality plants require nitrogen as a nutrient. One of the most widely consumed fruits in the world, tomatoes, depends on nitrogen for solid leaves and stems that produce fruit. This experiment investigated whether, in a controlled environment, nitrogen levels had an impact on tomato plant height. It anticipated that tomato plants would grow taller when given more nitrogen fertilizer.
Three groups of tomato plants were given different amounts of nitrogen fertilizer. In contrast to the control group, which received no nitrogen fertilizer, two experimental groups, one receiving high levels of nitrogen fertilizer and the other receiving low levels, all received nitrogen fertilizer. It started all plants from seeds, and heights were measured 50 days into the experiment.
An ANOVA was used to compare the effects of nitrogen levels on plant height between groups. The plants with the highest nitrogen fertilizer levels were the tallest, while the plants with low nitrogen levels grew more elevated than those in the control group. The effects of nitrogen concentrations on plant height were statistically significant, consistent with expectations and other research. This study reinforces the significance of nitrogen for tomato plants.
Introduction
Set the setting for your experiment at the start of your lab report. A funnel structure, or an inverted triangle, is one technique to construct your introduction:
- Start with the broad, all-encompassing research question.
- your topic to a more focused area of research
- Finish with a specific research question.
Additionally, start by introducing your study topic and highlighting its significance in a broad theoretical or real-world context. Describe pertinent prior research on your subject, noting how your study might support or add to it or how it might close a knowledge gap.
Example
- Referring to previous research: This laboratory study expands on earlier work by Haque, Paul, and Sarker (2011), who showed that higher nitrogen levels increased tomato plant output. Moreover, the current study, on the other hand, adopts a lab-controlled environment and concentrates on plant height as a growth indicator.
- Stating your hypothesis: The primary assumption was that plants with high nitrogen levels would grow the tallest because nitrogen is crucial for growing tomatoes. The alternative theory was that plants with low nitrogen levels would have higher stems than those with no nitrogen.
Next, outline the theoretical underpinnings of your research and any immediately applicable laws or equations you’ll be applying. Moreover, outlining your hypotheses allows you to state your primary research objectives and expectations.
Additionally, it’s okay if your introduction is brief, but you might want to break it up into a few paragraphs or use subheadings like “Research Context” or “Research Aims.”
Method
lab report The procedures you took to obtain and analyze the data are described in the method section. Provide sufficient information so that others can follow or assess your practices. Put the past tense in this section. Put any lengthy lists of materials or processes for procedures in the Appendices section; otherwise, mention them in the text here. The people, materials, and methods utilized for data collection and analysis should all be described in detail.
Experimental design
Indicate briefly if your study has a between-subjects or a within-subjects design, and if necessary, explain how your sample units were assigned to the conditions.
Additionally, three sets of tomato plants were employed in a between-subjects design. It did not give fertilizer containing nitrogen to the control group. Hence, a low level of nitrogen fertilizer was applied to the first experimental group, while It applied a high level of nitrogen fertilizer was to the second experimental group.
Subjects
Moreover, describe the demographics of human subjects and the genetic make-up of animals or plants, respectively. Take note of the total number of participants and the number of participants for each circumstance or group. Therefore, you should also describe the process you used to find study participants.
Material
Include a list of the tools or supplies you used to collect the data and the model names of any special equipment.
A list of the items
- 35 tomatoes seeds
- Soil
- fifteen planters (15 cm tall)
- Water
- Lamp lights (50,000 lux)
- Fertilizer with nitrogen
- Tape measure
Additionally, give specific details about the conditions and settings of your experiment. You can offer tagged pictures or diagrams showing the precise setup required for experimental tools. Therefore, describe the methods used to limit or fix superfluous variables at a certain level (e.g., keeping the lab at room temperature).
The plants were exposed to 12 hours of light per day, with light levels remaining constant during the experiment. Furthermore, the allowed range for the temperature was 23 to 25 °C. The soil’s pH and carbon content were maintained throughout the experiment to control plant height. However, the plants were appropriately spaced apart and grown in pest- and insect-free environments.
Procedures
It should outline the precise steps you performed to collect data in your experimental technique in chronological order. Furthermore, you should be succinct while giving enough details so that someone else can follow your procedure. However, where applicable, include comprehensive information in the appendices.
Additionally, you will frequently closely adhere to a lab manual to collect data for a lab experiment. Some teachers will permit you to cite the instructions and mention whether you modified any steps due to real-world issues. However, other teachers might need you to rewrite the manual lab instructions in whole sentences and cohesive paragraphs, noting any modifications to the steps you used.
For example, provide your intended analysis methodologies if you conduct thorough data analysis. However, this covers the kinds of tests you’ll do and any calculator applications or software you’ll employ (if relevant).
The first step was planting tomato seeds in wooden flats with soil about 2 cm below the surface. 3-5 cm were spared between each source. To keep the soil moist until germination, the apartments were covered. Eight days after It removed the seedlings, they were potted up to two at a time. It added water to each pot daily to keep the soil moist.
Furthermore, twelve days following transplantation, the plant pots received the nitrogen fertilizer treatment. The first experimental group received a low concentration, the second group received attention, and the control group received no treatment. However, each group contained five plant pots, and each pool was labeled with the name of the group to which the plants belonged.
However, all plants’ heights were measured 50 days after the experiment began. The plant length from the ground up to the top of the tallest leaf was measured using a measuring tape.
Result
Report the outcomes of any statistical analysis methods you used in your findings section. You must make it apparent how the results of statistical testing confirm or disprove your initial ideas.
The principal findings to be reported are:
- Any statistical test results
- Descriptive statistics
- Estimations of standard error or confidence intervals
- The importance of test results
Example
The plants in the control, low, and high nitrogen groups had respective mean heights of 20.3, 25.1, and 29.6 cm. To determine the impact of nitrogen fertilizer level on plant height, a one-way ANOVA was used. Furthermore, the findings showed statistically significant height differences (p =.03) between the groups.
Additionally, the primary and secondary hypotheses were then evaluated using post-hoc testing. The high nitrogen group plants were noticeably taller than the low nitrogen group and the control group plants, supporting the central premise. Moreover, the results also validated the second hypothesis, which showed that the low-nitrogen plants were taller than the plants in the control group.
Moreover, both tables and figures, as well as the text, may report these findings. Use prose to highlight a few significant results, present big numbers in tables, or use graphs to explain how variables are related.
Furthermore, the Results section should additionally provide sample computations for complicated experiments. Explain each sample calculation’s function briefly and utilize understandable symbols. However, refer to your raw data in the Appendices section to identify any trends or outliers.
Discussion
In the Discussion section, you can demonstrate your comprehension of the experimental procedure and your capacity for critical thought.
You can: in this section:
- Describe your findings.
- Compare your results to what you had anticipated.
- Find any areas where the experiment went wrong.
- Describe any unexpected outcomes.
- Make recommendations for enhancements to future research.
Clarifying how your findings contribute to resolving your primary research question is part of interpreting your results. Indicate whether your findings confirm your theories.
- Did you record the data you intended to record?
- Were your analysis techniques suitable for these particular data?
Compare your findings to those of other studies and explain any significant discrepancies.
- Are your findings consistent with those of similar studies or those of your peers? If not, why not?
It will also highlight the study’s advantages and disadvantages in an effective Discussion section.
- Are your internal validity and dependability high?
- How were these components of your study established?
Use concrete instances to illustrate limitations. For example, if random error played a significant role in your study’s measurements, identify the specific causes of error (such as faulty equipment) and discuss how to fix them.
Example
The findings are consistent with the idea that plant height is influenced by nitrogen levels, with higher levels resulting in taller plants. However, with other studies, these statistically significant findings demonstrate the significance of nitrogen as a nutrient for tomato plant growth.
In contrast to earlier research, this one concentrated on plant height as a measure of plant growth in the current trial. However, evaluating other parameters would have enhanced the study findings because plant height may not necessarily indicate plant health or fruit yield.
The method used to assess plant height is another study restriction because plants with high curvature could not be measured using a measuring tape. However, future research might concentrate on other approaches to assessing plant height.
Furthermore, the controls for extraneous factors, like pH and soil carbon levels, were this study’s critical assets. All other variables that could affect plant height were strictly controlled to isolate the effects of nitrogen levels, giving this study strong internal validity.
Conclusion
The final element of your lab report should be your conclusion. Here, you’ll summarize your experiment’s results, its advantages and disadvantages, and any implications for future research. Because the Conclusion and Discussion sections overlap, some lab reports may not include one, but you should consult your instructor before doing so.
Qualities of a laboratory report
No experiment is successful until a report on it is made public. No matter how meticulously and deftly an investigation is carried out, all the work is useless if no one ever finds out about it. Furthermore, every scientist needs to develop the crucial talent of effectively conveying their research findings.
You will be required to create formal lab reports for some of your studies to help you acquire this crucial ability. This kind of report follows a similar structure. You are utilized in scholarly journal papers by professionals. However, It will cover the writing of a formal lab report in this handout.
- Writing
- Practical details
- Citations
Writing
Additionally, the lab report is intended to be both a record of your work and an explanation of how you interpreted the experiment and the conclusions you came to. You must write so that the reader may comprehend what you did in the lab and how it relates to physics principles.
However, similar to any other report or paper you write, you should be mindful of your writing style and content. Even though your words won’t, the report’s wording must be precise and transparent because It will evaluate it primarily on its grammar, spelling, and composition.
Practical details
Furthermore, word processing is required for all official lab results. It cannot submit official lab reports in handwriting. It may provide you grip with hs produced by a computer during data collection in the lab. However, It can simply affix these to the formation it belongs to. Retyping data tables is recommended. Your report is based on your worksheet or lab notes.
Citations
You must cite the sources of any information you use from them. Academic integrity is only enforced if this is done. The APA documentation style is the most often used format for citations. This seminar will use the APA style manual. Therefore, on the following page, a few APA-style samples are provided.
Conclusion
The final element of your lab report should be your conclusion. Here, you’ll summarize your experiment’s results, its advantages and disadvantages, and any implications for future research. Because the conclusion and discussion sections overlap, some lab reports may not include one, but you should consult your instructor before doing so.
Additionally, an overview of your experiment and a discussion of the lessons you learned are provided in the conclusions portion of your report. “Our experiment measured/tested X using method Y, and our results were Z” should be the format of the summary. Of course, writing your resume will likely require more than one person.
However, it should be, at most, a paragraph or two. It should include your thoughts on the experiment’s challenges and triumphs in the conversation. Suggestions for how It might change the investigation to produce better findings or investigate novel aspects of the phenomena.
Read more…
