Improve your writing

How to Make the Write Money Part 3

Going further into the beautiful art of creative writing. Useful instructions for the aspiring writer.

Your story will be more likely to come alive if you have authenticity in your settings – your descriptive pieces.This is achieved by your own familiarity with what you are writing about, in other words, heed what has been said many times; “always try to write about what you know.”

Consult your notebooks, your files, your “bank.” You should be accumulating a store of sketches on places, people, settings that you can dip into, words that will trigger your imagination and put validity into your descriptions. The art of description is not easy but can be made less difficult by the application of a few rules, and practice. Make detailed and mentally pictorial notes of food, clothes, furnishings, household utensils, everything in fact, that can be seen, heard, touched, tasted, or smelt.

This is invaluable practice in enabling you to introduce authenticity into your writing. The authors aim is to make the reader react to the description so that he can actually feel, see, hear, touch or smell that which is being described. At least try to look at pictures with the eye of the painter, buildings with the eye of an architect, listen to sounds with the ear of a musician.

The purpose of narrative description is to conjure up a vivid picture of the actual setting, but beware; if the description is too laboured, too long, or too high flown it will fail to achieve its desired effect. It must always possess some artistic merit, even when it only represents the commonplace; the one unforgivable offence of the writer is to be dull.

How do you avoid this risk of boring your reader with your descriptive passages? Dramatise. No better illustration of this intensifying process could be found than in this description; “Martin hesitated with his hand on the rusty latch of the formal gates. The wind had swung the gate against him as he approached, but the latch was caught up and did not fall into its hasp. He fingered the twisted iron ring which served as a handle and looked deprecatingly at the slovenly brick and rough cast front of Garroch. An eaves gutter had leaked and the plaster of the upper floors was marked with long brown streaks where dribbles of stained water had run into a strange pattern like the sketch of an inverted tree. The three half-dead little firs planted haphazard in the rough grass before the house wagged their heads fiercely in the October wind.

“If I believed in omens,’ reflected Martin, “I should certainly not go in. The gate bangs in my face and the trees shake their heads at me.” “

With acknowledgement to the late J.D.Beresford.

Notice how cleverly the author has combined drama into a descriptive passage. Scenes like this are fairly commonplace on a sombre, autumn day, but the reader is made to feel that this scene is quite out of the ordinary. The kind of details wanted in present day fiction are those know only to someone who has carefully observed them. If it is a town then you need to know the typical objects, building, people, jobs, livestock; again, that you know, for what is in your subconscious will surface to your conscious self when you are creating.

Nothing heightens suspense so much as clear descriptions of the natural elements. Creative writing possesses the great advantage of being able to rely on and distinguish between the most trivial atmospheric conditions; a screeching wind, a moaning wind, a gust of wind, a drizzle or a downpour.

Use your imagination, create the conditions in your head, visualize them and write down immediately what comes to mind. After all, this is only your rough draft. You can get down to the pleasurable business of refining and polishing later.

Writing is an adventure. To begin with, it is a toy and an amusement. Then it becomes a mistress, then it becomes master, then it becomes a tyrant. The last phase is that just as you are about to be reconciled to your servitude you kill the monster and fling him to the public.

STYLE

“Style, or craftsmanship, or form, or whatever other word you select to mean the same thing, is not a quality tacked on or spread over or fitted on to a writer’s work, but the very quality of the work itself.’ So remarked a distinguished critic.

Style is really the way you look at things. Things may vividly impress you and your reaction to these impressions may result in a style that is flamboyant, satirical, sardonic, passionate, or harsh. Of course there are several ways of expressing the same thing, but verbal bliss is only one of many considerations which make up an authors style. It is a frame of mind, a manifestation of the subconscious.

It is as well to remember that it is just not enough to have an admirable plot, or solid settings and characterisation, which, by themselves constitute the greater part of the story, but the writer needs to acquire a style of their own. Not necessarily a correct one, but at least a distinctive one. Otherwise he/she cannot hope to make their readers see people and places as they would wish to.

I can do no better to conclude this section than quote a piece of excellent advice offered by that master story teller Somerset Maugham to a would-be author; “The writer is well advised who writes most simply. I would have him use the plainest words and put them in the most natural order. I have no patience with writers who employ bizarre constructions and make a parade of unusual epithets. Nothing goes out of fashion so quickly as affectation, nor is anything so stilted as the modish phrase of the year before last. Above all, be clear. I do not think any writer has the right to ask the reader to puzzle over his meaning. If he knows it himself he can put it in plain terms; if he is unwilling to do this he must be very sure that it is profound enough to repay the readers trouble when he has got to the bottom of it. Nothing is so tiresome as the obscurity which envelopes a commonplace.”

In stating as fully as I could how things really were, it was often difficult and I wrote awkwardly and the awkwardness is what they called my style. All mistakes and awkwardness are easy to see, and they called it style. Ernest Hemingway

2
Liked it

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “How to Make the Write Money Part 3”
  • Adam Henry Sears
    December 7th, 2008 at 1:51 pm

    Hi there Harry. How are you? Nice job on encouraging descriptive writing. I certainly agree with most of what you say. I just had a few thoughts I’d like to share.

    I disagree with you when you say that narrative description is the highest form of suspense. Don’t take this the wrong way; after all, unique description and personification can certainly aid the material when the passage is about a place or thing. Yet, I believe it is dialogue, not description, that reveals the more tense and heightened conflicts that create suspense. Yet, you didn’t treat the subject of dialogue here. The descriptive passage you quote certainly gives off a foreboding sense. Yet, we as readers don’t look upon it as ominous until the visitor says the word omens, and makes the connection between the description and the possibility of further conflict.

    Also, in your section titled style, at the very beginning you quote someone who has no idea of the differences between style, form, and craftsmanship, and puts them all into one block representing stylized writing. Yet, these things each have a separate meaning and purpose in writing. It’s just my opinion, but, I think you made an error in judgement when you selected this quote. On the side of that; writers shouldn’t be learning from critics, even very distinguished ones. They should be learning from what other writer’s have done. He’s right that style does affect the quality of the work, but if s/he does not recognise those as separate tools, why should we put stock in what s/he says?

    You were right to quote Maugham; beginners should avoid trying to stylize, because a firm grasp on a personal style develops only after years of practice at writing. Beginners should focus on being as direct and clear in their writing as possible. When they feel comfortable enough that they can write on a wide variety of scenes, and write fluidly without pause, then they can start employing quirky words here and there.

    You can tell that Hemingway, while making that statement, was shaking his head in disapproval, not nodding it in assent. You can also tell that he is talking about critics; critics maiming his early works.

    I hope this helps. I hope my intentions in writing you here are clear: merely to provide feedback on your work. If any of this comes across as rude or ill-concieved, then I appologize. Thanks for sharing, and good luck.

  • Harry D
    November 16th, 2010 at 7:35 am

    Hi Adam, many thanks for your comprehensive and constructive criticism of my writing article, part three. Bear in mind, that was just part three of a three parter. Nice to talk to someone who is able to discuss writing in a cohesive and knowledgable manner. Best wishes, Harry.

Leave a Reply
Click the icon to the left to subscribe to Writinghood with your favorite RSS reader.
© 2009 Writinghood | About | Advertise | Contact | Submit an Article
Powered by