Improve your writing

World of Poetry 4: The Poem

The parts of the poem and how to recognize them and examples.

The Poem

There are dozens of poetic forms, each one of them having a separate rhyme scheme and structure. A handful of them are: ballad, chant royal, triolet, roundel, sonnet, virelay, villanelle, ode, epic, haiku, tanka, and monotetra. This is just a slice of the pie: there are many different sub-species of forms as well, like the Petrarchan Sonnet, or the Grande ballade. Some are difficult, like the Crown of Sonnets, or the sestina, while others are a little easier to pull off like the ballad or the regular ode. Needless to say, there is enough resource for the venturing poet to keep busy for the rest of his or her life if he or she wants to be great at each and every form available.

The Blank Poem & Blank Verse

These are forms of poems that belong in the Poem section because even though they do not include a rhyme scheme, they are driven by meter and have a highly rhythmic nature.

Blank Verse

Many poets know what blank verse is, having read some of Shakespeare’s plays. Yet, to be sure: a blank verse is a type of metrical writing that can be shown, nine times out of ten, in iambic pentameter (five feet of disyllabic verse where the stress falls on the second syllable of each foot), but which does not incorporate rhyme except on a rare occasion. Blank verse can also be marked by caesura and enjambment.

An Example (Excerpt from Ulysses by Alfred, Lord Tennyson)

“It little profits that an idle king,
By this still hearth, among these barren crags,
Matched with an aged wife, I mete and dole
Unequal laws unto a savage race,
That hoard, and sleep, and feed, and know not me.
I cannot rest from travel; I will drink
Life to the lees. All times I have enjoyed
Greatly, have suffered greatly, both with those
That loved me, and alone; on shore, and when
Thro’ scudding drifts the rainy Hyades
Vext the dim sea. I am become a name;
For always roaming with a hungry heart
Much have I seen and known, — cities of men
And manners, climates, councils, governments,
Myself not least, but honored of them all, —
And drunk delight of battle with my peers,
Far on the ringing plains of windy Troy.
…”

Blank Poem

The blank poem is an off-shoot of the blank verse idea. This is very tight form of poem, in spite of how it sounds, because even though it has no rhyming pattern, its every word is qualitatively measured right into the poem’s rhythmic structure so that though it has no rhyme, it surely reads like it might at any time. It’s dependence on meter or cadence and the content is obvious the more of it you read.

An Example (An Excerpt from Lullaby by Wystan Hugh Auden)

“Lay your sleeping head, my love,
Human on my faithless arm;
Time and fevers burn away
Individual beauty from
Thoughtful children, and the grave
Proves the child ephemeral;
But in my arms till break of day
Let the living creature lie,
Mortal, guilty, but to me
The entirely beautiful.”

Meter: The Engine

In a poem, the structure is like the frame of the car. Rhyme and verbiage can be considered the shiny body of the car. But meter is the engine that drives it. The one thing that every poem needs to be successful, other than appropriate content, is proper meter. But let’s not confuse rhythm with meter; rhythm is brought about by combinations of meter and structure. Rhythm is set by separation of thougts, length of line and stanza, and purpose. So what is meter?

Meter is the cadenced language which flows with the rise and fall of stressed and unstressed syllables. A stressed or accented syllable takes longer to pronounce. An unstressed or unaccented syllable takes a shorter time to pronounce. If you are used to reading faster than a speeding bullet, or if you have not ‘trained your ear’ for words, then you are going to miss the importance of meter. You probably won’t even realize there are such things as stressed and unstressed syllables. Yet, look in any dictionary for pronunciation guidelines, and you will see which is which. The stressed syllable in a dictionary will have a ` or ,) in front or in back of it. Let’s take the word pronunciation for instance. The dictionary tells us (using ` and ,) that it should be said pro-NUN-see-AY-shun, in essence showing that there are two stressed syllables. In poetic dictionaries and guides,  the unstressed syllable is shown by a ~ or ^ while the stressed is shown by – or /. In my own notes, I have begun to use the + sign as the stressed syllable and the – sign as the unstressed.

Before we get into the technical details, we must first understand the nature of meter. We must come to know the natural sounds of words and how they are pronounced. Most single syllable words are stressed. Yet, some are not. Most of those that are not are prepositions, pronouns, conjunctions and other smaller articles of speech. But, I don’t want you to worry about all that. Instead, let’s take the time to ‘listen’ to how people stress certain syllables in their every day speech. To make obvious what I mean, I will show you using capitalized letters the natural stresses in the next few lines. IN EVeryDAY LANguage, you can SENSE the WEIGHT of what PEOple SAY. AS they SPEAK, their NATural inFLECtions TELL you exACTly WHAT it IS they WANT you to HEAR and UNderSTAND. YET, there ARE TIMES, with CERtain FORCED proNUNciAtions, when they WANT you to REalIZE and REcogNIZE a parTICular WORD that HE OR SHE MIGHT EMphaSIZE for CERtain efFECT. Do you see what I mean now?

Parts of Meter

A metrical ‘foot’ is a measure in poetry of fixed combinations of stressed and unstressed parts of speech. There are many. The iambus or iamb (~  –), one unstressed syllable followed by one stressed syllable, is perhaps the most commonly used in English poetry. The following is a list of 6 of the most widely known and used. There are others, but for now let’s stick to the most commonly known and used.

The Six Most Common Feet

  • iamb or iambus  (~  –)  [unstressed, stressed]  ex.: create; destroy; for me; [iambic]
  • trochee or choree  (–  ~)  [stressed, unstressed]  ex.: anger; loving; try me; [trochaic]
  • anapest or anapaest  (~ ~ –)  [unstressed, unstressed, stressed]  ex.: to the store; in the woods; [anapestic]
  • dactyl  (–  ~ ~)  [stressed, unstressed, unstressed]  ex.: tragedy; silliness; twenty in; [dactylic]
  • spondee  (–  –)  [stressed, stressed]  ex.: deep brook; broad sea; [spondaic]
  • pyrrhic  (~ ~)  [unstressed, unstressed] ex.: in the; to a; was a; [pyrrhic] To some prosodists, the pyrrhic is not considered an actual measure because of its lack of an accented syllable. Yet, to those who have remained faithful to the spirit of poetry, ie. Donne, Milton, Hardy, Tennyson, etc., the pyrrhic has its place in recorded poetic theory.

The iamb is perhaps the most commonly known and used. It has perhaps been used by every poet up until the mid-modern age (1980s) and in fact is still used by many. The trochee, which is the opposite of the iamb, is running a close second place to the iamb’s popularity and usage. The anapest is the foot used in writing limericks, among other forms of Light Verse. Dactyls, though not as sprighty as the anapest, have a similar flair for Light Verse. The pyrrhic and spondee, though not as popular as the iamb and trochee, have had their moments in versification, the former usually cropping up in narrative and the latter sometimes happening with a sound effect.

A poet should take care when using these metrical forms, for they are the engine that spur the flow of any poem, and it is through learning how to recognize the natural inflections of pronounced syllables that we grasp the intention of meter.

Organizing Your Meter

When we write a line of verse then break to the next line, and so on, the meter is what carries the beat or flow. So how do we organize these feet to follow a rhythm? Well, let’s take a look at the different metrical lines and figure that out.

Rows of Metrical feet are called:

  • Monometer (one foot line) [rare] ex.: ‘Prisoner…’ {dactylic monometer}
  • Dimeter (two foot line) [less common] ex.: ‘In woman’s eyes…’ {iambic dimeter}
  • Trimeter or tercameter (three foot line) [fairly common] ex.: ‘Well there once was a man on the street…’ {anapestic trimeter}
  • Tetrameter (four foot line) [common] ex.: ‘Kill me now or wait till later…” {trochaic tetrameter}
  • Pentameter (five foot line) [most common] ex.: ‘Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?’ {iambic pentameter}
  • Hexameter (six foot line) [less common] ex.: ‘Fortune is a lady no man leaves behind him.’ {trochaic hexameter} Called an alexandrine when concluding a Spenserian Stanza.
  • Heptameter (seven foot line) [rare] ex.: ‘I have decided—none shall venture far without my help.’ {iambic heptameter} Also known as a septenary or fourteener.
  • Octometer (eight foot line) [very rare] ex.: ‘In darkness weighs victorious the light that leads the convoy home.’ {iambic octometer} This is also known as an octonarius.

Choosing Meter

Depending on how much we want to say per line, and how we want our basic rhythm to move, we then should choose the type of meter according to that formulation. For instance, if I wanted to start my poem by saying “I love the woods”, then it would fall under iambic dimeter and I would have to choose the next few lines carefully enough to match that first pattern. For instance:

I love the woods,    (iambic dimeter)
its shady moods,    (iambic dimeter)
and all its verdant patterns.    (iambic trimeter)

This is a kind of play on the basic structure of the first two lines of the ballad stanza.

Stanzas: The Poem’s Paragraph

A stanza is a recurring unit of verses or lines in a poem that can range in size anywhere from one to two hundred lines plus. The most common stanza is the quatrain, a four-line set of verses. Much like the paragraph of prose, there are many varieties and many ways to choose which stanzas  will suit the content of the poem. The quatrain, for instance, is suitable for most stories, fables, and songs, and most common among the quatrains is the ballad stanza, which has alternating lines of six and eight syllables that rhyme together.

Here is a list of the most common stanzas found in poems.

  • Monostich (one line stanza) [very rare] Also known as a mote, or glose.
  • Distich or Couplet (two line stanza) [common]
  • Tristich or tercet (three line stanza) [rare in English]
  • Tetrastich or quatrain (four line stanza) [very common]
  • Pentastich or cinquain (five line stanza) [less common] Also known as quintet or quintilla.
  • Hexastich or sextain (six line stanza) [less common] Also known as sestet.
  • Heptastich or septet (seven line stanza) [rare]
  • Octonarius or octet (eight line stanza) [common] Also known as octave.
  • Neuvain (nine line stanza) [very rare]
  • Decastich or dizain (ten line stanza) [less common]

Larger stanzas are only typical of longer or epic poems, so should be avoided when writing shorter poems.
There are many poems that have a pre-determined metrical pattern, like the sonnet, or villanelle, or haiku, or rondel. However, there are forms of poems that don’t require you to follow an already set pattern or rhyme scheme, like the virelay or ballad.

Haiku and tanka, which are Japanese styles, do not require either a set metric or rhyme scheme, but must follow a strict syllabic pattern. Of course, there is much more to these forms than just syllables. See the link below for the origins and theories of the haiku.

No Particular Requirement

In choosing the size and style of stanza, the poet can create a poem that doesn’t have to match any traditional form such as the roundel or chant royal. The form in itself should be an aid to the content and vice versa, not to mention, you don’t have to stick to a strict formula for creating stanzas. Thomas Hardy is popular for his varieties of stanza forms. Here is an example called “The Walk“:

    “You did not walk with me
    Of late to the hill-top tree
        By the gated ways,
        As in earlier days;
        You were weak and lame,
        So you never came,
And I went alone, and I did not mind,
Not thinking of you as left behind.

    I walked up there to-day
    Just in the former way:
        Surveyed around
        The familiar ground
        By myself again:
        What difference, then?
Only that underlying sense
Of the look of a room on returning thence.”

Now that you know all about the integral parts of a poem, you should have no problem, right? Well, I guess that depends on how you view the material here. I can certainly understand that there is much to learn, and I did not touch on everything, only on the basics. If I were to expand on this article by explaining all of the different poetic devices and forms, this would turn into a one hundred page book at least. It can all be quite overwhelming. However, I hope this article in principle helps you to understand the workings of poetry. As you can see from these articles, a free verse is not a poem, a blank verse is not free verse, and not everything can become poetry simply because it was expressed.

I hope this series becomes the spring-board that you use to propel yourself into a deeper understanding of the world of poetry.

World of Poetry 1: Four Elements, Three Divisions

World of Poetry 2: The Free Verse

World of Poetry 3: The Free Form

World of Poetry 5: Rhyme

Other Articles by Adam Henry Sears:

The True Haiku and its Origins,

Writer’s Block 1, Writer’s Block 2,

If You’re Going to Write, Read, Read, Read,

Self-Editing Made Easy,

12 Quotes To Inspire All Writers,

Poem, Free Form, Free Verse: Recognizing the Differences,

Blogs & IMs: The Band of Good Writing Habits

A Free Verse by Adam Henry Sears

Running Through The Fog

Some Poems by Adam Henry Sears

A Tiara for Tiara

A Tribute To Arwen After The Age of Men

Venusian Temple

Dragon’s Child

Wearing Frowns

12
Liked it

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

20 Responses to “World of Poetry 4: The Poem”
  • kate smedley
    April 1st, 2009 at 4:00 am

    Thanks for all of these Adam, I’ve printed them off to read again, that Thomas Hardy poem you quoted is one of my favourite poems, I love it. Great series of articles I can learn a lot from and hopefully put into practice!

  • maranatha
    April 1st, 2009 at 11:52 am

    This is excellent – I am bookmarking you so I can study further. I have written a little, but never considered it much – just paid attention to the flow.

  • Judy Sheldon
    April 1st, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    I’ve written poetry since I was a child and could not tell you what kind of poetry I write. It’s just something I love doing. Our English class covered very little on this topic. Thanks so much for the information. Perhaps I will learn something and in the process learn to write better.

  • Inna Tysoe
    April 2nd, 2009 at 2:14 am

    Thanks for that.

    Inna

  • Eunice Tan
    April 2nd, 2009 at 2:31 am

    Thanks for this worthy lesson. This piece is really precious.

  • Dee Gold
    April 3rd, 2009 at 3:56 am

    I need this,thanks

  • Abhichoco
    April 4th, 2009 at 12:26 am

    this is really great and informative…..
    very clearly u know what ur talkin about…
    i will surely find these handy when im writing my poems….
    also…plz read and comment on my poems…
    peace…

  • ANOINTED DIVA
    April 4th, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    I LOVE WRITING INSPIRATIONAL CHRISTIAN POETRY.
    I HAVE BEEN WRITING INSPIRATIONAL CHRISTIAN POETRY SINCE I WAS A CHILD.
    I ENJOYED READING YOUR ARTICLE ON READING AND WRITING POETRY.
    YOUR ARTICLE HELPED ME OUT AS A CURRENT POET.
    I WILL GET MY BOOK OF INSPIRATIONAL CHRISTIAN POETRY PUBLISHED REAL SOON.
    I WRITE RHYMING POEMS A LOT.
    I AM VERY GOOD IN WRITING RHYMING POEMS.
    HAVE A BLESSED AND PROSPEROUS EVENING AND WEEK.

  • CutestPrincess
    April 5th, 2009 at 3:47 am

    this is very educational…

  • Dianneapril
    April 5th, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    Thank you for the information. I may just have to try another form of writing!

  • Stickinthemud
    April 7th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    Hey, Adam.
    As I said before, these are great articles and more people should read them. Thanks again.

  • Brent
    April 8th, 2009 at 8:00 am

    dude…i never realized how closely related the free form and the poem were. i always thought that the free form was the one that had no form to it, but i guess it’s the free verse that has no form. now come to figure out that the free form comes to look like a poem but actually isn’t. after all these years, here i’ve been writing free verse when I thought I was writing poems. shame on me for not knowing the difference! i feel like an idiot now, cause i should’ve known better. thanks for letting us all know and for doing it without talkin down to us. that is most apreciated man!!! im going to book mark this page so i can learn the differences and the things that make poems actually poems. thanks again. cool cool cool have a good one.

  • Aisyahsplace
    April 8th, 2009 at 11:03 am

    hey this was really good …learned a lot

  • Yovita
    April 13th, 2009 at 12:05 am

    Wow.. Thanks. This is an excellent article. I do learn a lot.

  • Hazel Crowther
    April 24th, 2009 at 9:09 am

    Thank you for this information, I need it and didn’t know where to go looking..

  • Emma C S
    April 28th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    I’ve just read all four of these and they’re fascinating. Next time I’m in a poetry phase, I shall definitely be returning to these in an attempt to improve. Although all that talk of spondees and dactyls did rather give me flashbacks to GCSE Latin. But anyway, these are some of the best articles I’ve read on here. I hope you don’t mind me adding you as a friend, I’m now anxiously awaiting the next part. :)

  • Marinela
    April 30th, 2009 at 6:02 am

    Thanks for this valuable lesson.

  • Nela
    May 5th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    These are great articles.
    thanks for sharing!!

  • Glynis Smy
    May 9th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Your series was very interesting. I have never studied poetry, we were not taught it at school. I only write my version of it. I will file this for sunshine reading in the garden and learn more, thanks.

  • Katie Marie
    May 10th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    This was very helpful. There have been times when things weren’t sounding just right and I wasn’t exactly sure why or what I needed to change. The clarification of the difference between the terms meter and rhythm and then the detailed explanation of meter may be very basic but for someone who knows ‘nothing’ of poetry terms it is very helpful. Thank you for taking the time to read some of my work and giving input.

Leave a Reply
Click the icon to the left to subscribe to Writinghood with your favorite RSS reader.
© 2009 Writinghood | About | Advertise | Contact | Submit an Article
Powered by